Posted by: Brent James on February 25, 2008
Apparently, the magic surrounding Barak Obama’s campaign for change is nothing short of overwhelming – for some attendees. Several incidents of fainting at Obama’s rallies have some wondering about the effect his aura is having on these hopeful fans. Inspiring millions is hard work, but so is reviving the afflicted. Just ask the paramedics.
Even so, let’s not get ahead of ourselves. Caution is the word of the day. What with all the embarrassed endorsees whose endorsements have failed to make the cut, it should stand to reason that the swelling acclaim is far too premature. I’m sure Mr. Obama would himself discourage the Messiah-like overtones of his follower’s enthusiasm.
So taken with the Senator’s charisma, mothers are considering “Barak” for baby names. Oh please. How about “George” as in George Washington. Until a leader is proven worthy, let’s not join the hypesters when the tumult gives sway. Make an assessment based on solid values.
Imagine the possible name combinations. I’m getting dizzy just thinking about it.
Back to top of page.
Posted by: Brent James on February 18, 2008
Historical context is a marvelous vantage point. Its contribution to the present is perspective. The muddled is made clear. Relevance may now be declared.
America’s war on terrorism has been dubbed “George Bush’s war” by many wishing to distance themselves from it for the purpose of attracting voters. The rhetoric is blatant and expected as the media likens each conflict to Vietnam. How did the political operatives during the Vietnam era couch this struggle? What context was it given?
Watch this classic political ad from 1960. It is true; there is nothing new under the sun. The message sounds packaged, but timeless. Amazing how history repeats itself even in the details – presidential campaign ads notwithstanding.
Back to top of page.
